Cutting right to the chase, I like the new 24-70VR lens, its beautiful. If you own the original 24-70AFS should you rush out and replace it? From first impressions, I’d say only if you really think you must have VR. If you’re in the market for the first time to buy a 24-70, which should you buy? The VR hands down! What kind of statements can I make about the new 24-70VR after just a few hours? Ya, it’s heavier because it now has a VR motor inside. Yes, the lens barrel is made from the same composite as the 300PF and 18-35AFS which has already proven themselves outstandingly rugged. Yes, it feels really good in the hand with silky smooth action. And yes, it is sharp! And you ask if am I buying one …
…I’m on the fence still. We went for a hike up to McCloud Lake on Saturday and I took the 24-70VR along (I hate bald skies). Inspection of those images look really sweet. I particularly like the starburst it makes when you include the sun. More importantly to me is its performance at f/2.8 and there, I feel it performs a tad better than the original 24-70. My sweet brides portrait needed to have a little retouching, it’s just a tad too sharp (but she’s gorgeous anyway). I have NOT done extensive shooting let alone testing between the two lenses to say much else. I can say I like the improved lens shade but thats not a deal maker. I know it is sharp corner to corner. More field time is required for this very important tool in my camera bag before I can say for certainty it is THE 24-70. mtc