May 21, 2010 | Field Reports
I have a whole lot of images in my files, lots of all time favorites taken with the FX format. Before the D3, that’s the only digital option available to us. Jim makes the assertion that the composition wouldn’t change going up or down in sensor size and while in principle that’s true, for me there was a difference. This is only because the size of the image I saw in the viewfinder was like a pocket TV where that of the D3 is like a HD TV. That larger view for me makes it possible to quickly see those elements I want to include while seeing those I want to exclude. The speed for my eye to see this I feel helps in make the click of that deceive moment easier. I’ve personally seen an improvement in my photography since the D3 landed in my office. Is this why?
Then Nikon got back to make “35mm” lenses which they had been doing for such a long time. Is there a difference in quality between FX and DX lenses? Not anymore then there is between any two lenses you care to compare from within a manufacture or between different manufactures. When the D3 came out, the 14-24AFS and 24-70AFS came out. These are two gorgeous lenses that up until recently were pretty much main stays in my photography. That statement will lead you to think they aren’t anymore. Well, they are and they aren’t.
Nikon helps you visually take inventory of what you have and what you don’t have in your camera bag. Their Nikkor Lens Positioning Chart graphically helps you look at what you’ve got in a graphic way. And the discussion continues.
May 21, 2010 | Field Reports
Which came first, the photographer or the camera? I ask myself that question often. Did someone look at the world and think they should have a means of faithfully record and present it to others? Or, did some mad scientist just happen to smere some goop on a glass plate and stumble onto recording life faithfully? Yes, history tells us the answer except what was going through their minds prior to the invention. What lead them to take the steps that produced the desire to take photography from the mind to reality? If we could ask them, could we learn something about our own photography today?
”Your photos and technical insights are outstanding, and I enjoy reading your emails each day. After looking at the incredible results you get, I often wonder what your photos would look like if shot with a D200/300/300s or other mid-level camera. (I am a Nikon shooter still working with a D200, and plan to upgrade when Nikon puts HD video into either the 300s or 700 replacement). Your compositions wouldn’t change of course, but you often take advantage of the extraordinary technical capabilities of the cameras and lenses you own. Would you ever consider spending a day with a D300s to see how it would change your approach and results — it would be interesting for those of us who will likely never own a D3s or equivalent to see what you would do.”
Jim’s question is pretty common and as far as I am concern, a very, very, very valid question. At the same time, I’m not sure the answer whatever it might be has really any relevance. As he rightfully points out, I only shoot with FX with the D3x and D3s shooting those lenses designed for that format. The DX format and those lenses I don’t shoot. Is that a quality call or, rather, just a personal preference? Whatever that answer might be for me, does it make any difference to your photography?
I’m going to try to answer this question today in a couple of posts. Let’s start by all being on the same page. This is where Nikon lends a helping hand. They have put out the Nikkor Lens Simulator. No clue if we’ll find the answer, but we’ll give it a go.
May 20, 2010 | Field Reports
[swf]http://www.moosepeterson.com/swf_imgs/_BMP8708.swf, 585, 473 [/swf]
Schools out, I’ve got my shooting partner back which is great even if he is in my photo. Man, have we got plans, can’t wait!
May 19, 2010 | Field Reports
[swf]http://www.moosepeterson.com/swf_imgs/_BMP2419.swf, 404, 600 [/swf]
Sitting in the lounge at LGA waiting to come home, the reflections in the pillar grabbed my attention. All the signs, lights, windows are so clearly reflected yet the people, they don’t at all. It’s oblong shape disappears with all the reflections and the overcast light from the rainy day. And the looks on folks faces when I photographed the pillar probably was the best. I wish I had the nerve to point the lens at them.
May 19, 2010 | Field Reports
I don’t care if there is an audience of one thousand or just one, this is why photographers have an obligation to give back for all they have been blessed with. You only have to reach one person in the process to know not only that it works, but it’s why you’re a photographer. Thanks Gary!!!
May 18, 2010 | Field Reports
[swf]http://www.moosepeterson.com/swf_imgs/_BMP1181.swf, 585, 473, [/swf]
Our day in the park was great. Many have asked what was my favorite image from the day. Hands down it was this. This small class were having a blast with their teachers as they explored nature. I can’t think of a better use of an adults time then to inspire kids and to be let into that moment of time, very special!
