You Are the Best Judge, Really!

There’s probably only one thing better then spending a day shooting with folks, it’s having dinner with them and reliving the day’s fun! Like any gathering of photographers, be it a large group or just a couple of folks, conversation always tends to head towards the philosophical side of photography. One of the questions that’s been raised many, many times has to do with the image(s) and whether one or others liked this or that image or not. One of the most requested features at DLWS is the crit session, where the participant sits with an instructor and the instructor gives their input into the image. It raises a very important aspect of our photography that I think too many take way too for granted!

[swf]http://www.moosepeterson.com/swf_imgs/DMLWEAO3050.swf, 585, 444 [/swf]

I more then understand that getting the opinion of someone who you respect helps your ego, but does it really help your photography? When I see folks go out the very next day and make the exact same mistake we just discussed hours earlier at their crit, I question what’s being learned in the crit process. Don’t confuse this though with the value a crit you might get from an editor, which is totally different because the end result might seem the same, but it by no means is. I’m talking about the peer to peer comments which so many seem to hang on.

When you push the shutter release, as far as I am concerned, the ONLY person you need to please, make happy, entertain and overwhelm is yourself! Photography is not a team sport. While there is no I in photography (sorry, watch too many movies), there is a Y which sounds close enough for me but really should stand for YOU (I know, lame). When we’re at the computer going through our images, who makes the final decision to keep this one image or delete that one? You do, right? That’s because they are YOUR images and you keep those you like and delete those you don’t. You don’t have a paneled jury saying yay or nay, do you?

[swf]http://www.moosepeterson.com/swf_imgs/DMLARME1105.swf, 585, 444 [/swf]

Your decision to keep an image can be based on many factors. Since they are YOUR images, you can keep whatever you like for whatever reason. Perhaps the image has a sentimental hold on you, it’s a one of a kind, it could be fun or, it simply might be a darn good photograph. That’s a damn good reason to keep a photo (not necessarily why you’d show it to others though, that’s a totally different criteria). Whatever the reason you decide to keep an image, they are your reasons and they are ALL valid! (I have always said that folks delete way too many photographs!) These are all images that you like and that makes them golden in my eyes, keepers!

If that’s the case, why do photographers like to show their images to others? That’s a complicated question, lots of reasons from good to bad but whatever the case the point, what did you want to accomplish with your photograph? Did you want to please yourself, or yourself and the world? We all know how difficult it is to please ourselves at times with our images. It’s no easy feat, right? When I’m editing through my day’s takes, I normally don’t let anyone else in the room with me because I’m muttering out loud, good, bad, stupid, idiot, right on, excellent and many other things. If it’s that hard to please ourselves, than isn’t it reasonable to expect that it’s that difficult, if not at times, impossible to please the world? Damn right!

[swf]http://www.moosepeterson.com/swf_imgs/DBOAO0179.swf, 465, 600 [/swf]


On a daily basis, sometimes hourly, I’m asked to make a comment on some one’s photos. Some just down right suck and yes, I say they suck (technically speaking). The majority though are in that no mans land of images where the photographer saw something but because of lack of inexperience, they just didn’t quite capture it to express it to the rest of the world. And that’s OK because it’s a place we’ve all been or are at in our photography, and it’s part of the learning curve. Whether I or someone else says they do or don’t like your photo, it should only be taken with a grain of salt. I know personally, there are tons of my own photographs that I love and the world simply doesn’t, and that’s OK. There are some that have received general acceptance and when that occurs, it’s a darn good feeling. When it comes to your photography, while other’s opinions might mean a lot to you, in the final analyze, their opinion won’t make or break your photograph or your photography. Your opinion will though! Take stock in what’s in your head and in your heart when it comes to your photographs. You are the best judge and you are the only judge!

The 200mm ?

70-200VR2 - 200f2VR - 200-400VR

With the posting of my camera bag contents, a number of emails and phone have come in with one simple question, “Why all the 200mm duplication?” That’s a damn good question, seriously! Why would anyone have a duplication of focal length let along four times (counting the 70-180 which is purt near 200mm)?

If you look at the three main “200mm” lenses I have, there is one difference that stands out. You have a f/2, f/2.8 and f/4. That’s one of the major reasons why I have the three in my bag. Next to light, DOF is a major influence in my photography. Controlling how much is and is not in focus consumes my mind when I first frame up a subject. While you can always close down a lens, when it comes to opening it, there is a limit. The only way to break that limit is to buy the lens that is fast. That’s the first and main reason I have the three different 200mm lenses, DOF control.

There are other reasons as well. The 200-400VR is my main big game lens. When I’m heading out to photograph bull elk or moose or any other ungulate, I’m going to grab the 200-400VR. Not the 200f2 and not the 600f4, but the 200-400VR, that’s just my personal way I like to photograph these magnificent creatures. Now what if I’m heading into a forest to photograph an ungulate? In a forest, you don’t have big open spaces where that 400mm will do much for you but instead, you tend to have a limited view. And that limited view is often obstructed by limbs and the like. Plus, typically in forests you have limited light. That’s where the 200f2 comes in to save the day.

So then what about the 70-200VR2, where does that come in? I’m doing more and more (and want to do even more) air to air photography. Sitting in the back seat of a T-6 or crammed (and I mean crammed) into the cockpit of a P-51, there is no room for a 200f2 let alone a 200-400 to shoot. So for this one aspect of my photography, the 70-200VR2 is great!

Now here’s the question’s most common component that I’m saving for last. “Which one of the three is sharpest?” We’re splitting hairs, but I think the 200f2VR is the sharpest of the three at 200mm. It’s just a wickedly sharp lens that produces images at f2 that are simply stunning. Hope this look at my thought process and trivia helps you out!

Calling all DLWS Alumni – all 1400 of You!

Not surprisingly, many of you alumni didn’t receive the special invite we sent out to you a number of weeks ago. Email address change way too fast and keeping us in the loop slipped your mind. You need to contact Stephanie (you must have Java to email Stephanie, spam protection) with an email just saying which DLWS event you attended and your new email address and she’ll take care of the rest. And we have to admit and thank those who been sending in some great emails proving that you’re crazy enough to join us. It’s been a lot of fun. Thanks!

Please note, we do not, nor ever have, announced a DLWS event more than 1 year in advance. There are many reasons for this, most are simple logistics. Now need to ask, we’re not tellin!

Reposted 1 Image HDR Video

I don’t know about you, but that first posting of the 1 Image HDR sucked. Something got lost in translation. It’s been reposted and now you can go FullScreen and read the menus. Enjoy!

error: Content is protected !!